Wednesday, September 26, 2012

"Wikis for Critical Thinking and Contextual Application."


The below blog post is a continuation from last weeks course plan for the Amphibious Warfare class I taught as a Naval ROTC instructor. This week's post shows the handout I would give the class outlining the details of the wiki project assignment. This is an exercise in critical thinking that challenges the student to think about amphibious warfare in more then just a historical context. It makes them analyze and evaluate strategies and tactics learned in the class and how they effect the tide of battle.
 
Wiki project handout

Ladies and gentlemen of AW141, this handout includes the detailed information needed to complete the course wiki project. The four groups (already assigned) will each choose one major battle during their era to break out from the group and create a “what if” scenario as to what would have happened had one deciding factor or strategy been different.

Example: If choosing the battle of Tarawa Atoll of WWII pacific theater, you could have chosen one of the following deciding factors to change to “what if”;

   - Air campaign: what if the carrier strike group had given the ground commander the    
     fully requested 3 days of pre-bombardment vice the 3 hours given?
 
            - Would the majority of defenders have survived to defend the atoll?
            - Would the emplaced guns have survived the bombing?
            - Would the ground campaign have been as long and bloody?

   - What if the tide had been at the level predicted or the reef as deep as predicted?

            - Would the landing ships have been able to reach shore on both sides of the atoll?
            - Would the initial wave have been able to secure a larger beachhead ?
            - If more heavy machine guns had made it to shore on the first wave, would the  
              number of American casualties been as high? 

Purpose

The purpose of the wiki project is to look at the “what if” scenario and predict what could have happened had a deciding factor or strategy been different in a major battle. This is an exercise in critical thinking that is designed to make you think about the strategies used in amphibious warfare and how single variables can often change the tide of war. The group will develop an in-depth analysis of the battle post-event and tie it in to any outcomes or innovations that resulted from the battle and further examine what impacts it would have had on future battles and the period in general.
 
i.e. In the Tarawa scenario, if the tide had been a little higher and the landing craft could have gotten all the way to shore, the first wave would have most likely developed a longer and deeper beachhead to land more equipment and personnel. The ensuing battle would have been much shorter and more decisive (this is a simple description; your scenario will need to be well developed and supported by historical examples and in-depth research).  
   - The Marine Corps developed a new landing craft, new tactics on securing the beachhead and new
     naval gunfire and air support procedures after the heavy losses in the battle on Tarawa – those
     innovations were deciding factors in future battles and on the war.

Frame

Home page: The Home page will contain a detailed account of the chosen battle and hyperlink to the “what if” scenario and detailed analysis.

Scenario page – the scenario page will have the detailed account of assumed actions and outcomes after taking into account the “what if” event. The page will also go into detail on assumptions of lost or altered innovations or strategies that resulted from the battle. The last section will have details on future battles and the time period/area covered (i.e. for Tarawa, how would the change have effected all the battles that occurred afterwards and the rest of the war in the pacific theater).

Management timeline

- The decision on which battle and the home page detailing the overall battle is due at the end of
  week 6.

- The “what-if” scenario must be approved by me before the mid-term break.

- The scenario page is due by the end of week 12.

- Discussion topics for posting on the other group’s scenarios will be will be outlined in class during 
  week 13 and due during week 14.

- The "what-if" scenarios will be presented in class for guided discussion during week 15.

6 comments:

  1. My question would be how many 'what if' scenarios will each battle have? I wasn't sure after the example.
    Great idea.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Katie,
      Each group will have one "what if" strategy or deciding factor change.

      Thanks,
      Dean

      Delete
  2. You hit on two of my favorite things: self-directed learning and peer input.

    I thought it was a good idea to allow the groups to pick the battle that they wanted to cover instead of assigning one. This allows the groups to choose a topic that they have an interest in and direct their own learning.

    I also liked your use of in class presentations and guided discussions. I believe this is a good way to involve peers and allow students to both give and receive feedback.

    Roy,

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, Dean, I think you have done an amazing job of covering all aspects of being a good facilitator. You have provided them with the necessary foundation, framework and goals to create their Wiki’s. I really like that you have given them a lot of information, but you have also given them a lot of leeway or room for their creativity to kick in. You have demonstrated the importance of allowing adults to be in control of their own learning – being self directed. You have also challenged them to create a project that demonstrates critical thinking. The only thing I did not see - was something I noticed in another blog – a grading rubric, which I think is essential to demonstrating exactly what the expected outcomes are for the project. West & West (2009) notes that providing a grading method increases students’ motivation. Otherwise, it was quite comprehensive.


    West, Margaret L. (2008-12-23). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration: The Power of the Read-Write Web (Jossey-Bass Guides to Online Teaching and Learning). Wiley Publishing. Kindle Edition.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the feedback Sonora; I had an outline of the grading rubric (how many points it was worth and how much was based on peer feedback) on the first lesson plan but you are correct, I should have given a detailed rubric for them to work with.

      Thanks,
      Dean

      Delete
  4. I find that self-directed learning aspects of your project an interesting way to move the class forward. I especially like your use of the "what if" s scenario. This is a great idea to foster discussion as well as approaching the scenario from a new perspective.

    ReplyDelete